Content protection
Copy restrictions reduce opportunities to move assessment content into outside tools.
Assessment integrity guide
Protect the process. Interpret signals responsibly.
Integrity safeguards help protect assessment content and provide context when testing behavior or response patterns require review.
Operating limits
Use integrity signals for review. Not automatic rejection.
Outside clicks, response patterns, copy restrictions, and identity checks add context. None of them should be treated as proof without an appropriate review process.
Outside-click context
Window changes can be recorded for review without assuming misconduct.
Response-pattern indicators
Candidness and fake-warning signals can identify results that require cautious interpretation.
Identity verification
Optional verification can add support for remote or higher-security testing situations.
Frequently asked questions
Before using Online Assessment Integrity Guide Set the safeguards.
Define the purpose, authorized users, review process, and limits before adding the information to a consequential decision.
Does leaving the assessment window prove cheating?+
No. It is a review signal and may have an innocent explanation.
Should integrity indicators disqualify a candidate?+
No. They should prompt appropriate review and follow-up in context.
When is identity verification useful?+
It may be useful for remote, higher-security, regulated, or safety-sensitive assessment situations.
Who should review integrity information?+
Authorized users who understand the assessment process, the role, and the organization’s policies.
A focused platform demonstration
Review the testing risk. Apply the right safeguard.
See how the platform protects content, records review signals, and supports proportionate follow-up.
Book a 30-Minute Platform Demo